Looking outside for one minute, the light seemed a bluish/grey, and then looking back into the room, it seemed a lot warmer - my husband reflected a golden glow! Then looking outside again, the light was definitely a sludgy blue. On ISO 400, and aperture f/5.6, I measured around the room. Shutter speed readings ranged from 1/8s to 1/3s. At ISO 100, at f/5.6 the reading was 1/2s.
I took three photographs at three different white balances: auto, sunlight and lightbulb.
Auto |
Sunlight |
Lightbulb |
Interior lit by fluorescent lamps with white balance set to Auto, fluorescent, and alternative fluorescent: for this exercise I took a picture in the Photographer's Gallery on one of the OCA Study Trips. I was particularly interested in the white and orange together with the same theme running through the photo on display:
High Colour Rendering Fluoresecent |
This is the best outcome; the colour of the floor is close to the original and the white wall is fairly neutral.
Standard Fluorescent |
Too pink/mauve...
Auto (changed in processing) |
Horrendous - way too blue!!
Interior lit by small CFL lamps with white balance set to Auto, fluorescent, and alternative fluorescent: for this part of the exercise I took a picture in my living room of my dog enjoying his Sunday. The results are the same as above, even with the darker environment and different colour scheme.
High Colour Rendering Fluorescent |
The best option; colours are very close to the real situation, although still some blue round the dog's shadows.
Auto (changed in processing) |
Again, horrendous - far too blue!
Standard Fluorescent |
Also bad - too pink!
Auto (set in camera) |
This is very similar to the High Colour Rendering Fluorescent above. As the option to change afterwards is always available, it is probably worth shooting on Auto and then changing afterwards if added warmth is required.
No comments:
Post a Comment